| By Jason A. Churchill | ![]() | By 01-17-2011 |
There are 27 days between now and the day pitchers and catchers report for spring training on February 13 -- the rest of the squad will report no later than February 18 with the first full-squad workout slated for the day after. | 1. By: jgstecker on 01-17-2011 11:11:06 Re: Tip #3 You can often find much better seat availability for the @SD games. The Padres fans don't travel in nearly the numbers that the Mariners fans do, so these tickets tend to get overlooked. A couple of years ago I found front row dugout seats at a San Diego home game while most of the surrounding @SEA games had sold most of the best seats. Along the same note, try to avoid planning around Cubs games in Peoria. Cubs fans tend to swarm to those games and getting good tickets can be tough. |
| 2. By: Jason A. Churchill on 01-17-2011 13:27:28 I'd recommend avoiding Scottsdale and Mesa, too. Not a lot to see, really. Just follow the players, otherwise. On the days tickets sell out, spend the morning and early afternoon watching the prospects! |
| 3. By: Chris Crawford on 01-17-2011 16:52:11 Tip 4: If you see me, I love hot dogs and beer. |
| 4. By: safecochatter on 01-17-2011 21:02:22 be there 24th thru 30th of march with my 15 yr old son. went the rental car route cuz close by motels were double. i usually drink lite beer,but if someone else is buying.... |
| 5. By: marinermutt on 01-17-2011 21:47:27 Nothing like spring training for a baseball fan. Love coming down and going over to the M's complex. Don't normally go to the spring training games, but go watch the minor league teams. There can be 3 games going on all at once. Great way to look at the prospects. Also fun to go watch both the majors and minors practice. Can get pretty close to the major league players and you can walk side by side with minor league players as the head down to their fields. Also, In-N-Out is less than a half mile away. For us who live in Seattle, the trip down for that alone is almost worth it. |
| 6. By: cdiggins@whidbey.com on 01-17-2011 22:07:49 The M's have not had a decent DH for years now and I don't think it was Jack Z's fault. I think the suits made him bring on Griffey both years and Jack would not have done that on his own especially last year. He is too smart for that. He knows he can't win without someone in the middle of the order to drive in runs, and with Cust he must have added a number of wins. ( I do not know enough to statistically figure that out). And Saunders had 10 HR's in 298 AB's and that comes out to 20 for 600 AB's. What if he does? And he had 8 outfield assists in just 89 games (most on the team). So with just these two additions- Cust and Saunders for full year they should be maybe a 70 win team. And with Gutierrez not needing to be HR hitter, he should return to his strengths. Here is hoping that things improve this year. Finally a DH who can hit. |
| 7. By: Jason A. Churchill on 01-17-2011 23:08:55 Anyone who finds me down there and says they read Prospect Insider, beer is on me that night! |
| 8. By: mauricewilliamsiii on 01-18-2011 00:03:39 I'll be there March 12-27 so if I see you Chris I'll keep tip #4 in mind. Jason with the relatively low payouts for Ryan and Olivo this season and the non guaranteed nature of the Paperboy, Kennedy and Bard contracts do you get the sense the team might have a mil or two left for the right player in trade or free agency? And there is no way I'd let you pay for my beer Jason so you can forget that right now. Where is a good place to see photos of you guys by the way? One last thing I know a lot of people see Cust as lacking the pull power to really benefit from Safeco but looking at hittracker I see a lot of warning track outs to straight away right in Oakland that should be homers in Safeco. I could see Cust approaching the 30+ homers he hit a few years ago. Do you agree? |
| 9. By: Jason A. Churchill on 01-18-2011 00:09:27 I think the M's would make room payroll wise for just about any salary if it made sense. |
| 10. By: Edman on 01-18-2011 01:30:22 #6, where do I start? First, the whole Griffey this is pointless. Just who was Jack going to sign that would be much better than Griffey's first year back? It wasn't like he was paid $10 million a season to be in Seattle. And, while I don't think there were too many anticipating that Griffey would be better than he was in 2009, nobody expected him or the team to be as bad as it was. Who cares if the M's FO wanted Griffey, 2009 he earned his money, 2010, he didn't, along with several teammates? Just who was Jack going to go get that would have made everything all better, for the same amount of money? The whole Saunders prognostication thing is no indication of anything. If he never gets another homerun for an additional 300 ABs, those projections are meaningless. It shows there may be hope, but it's not any form of justification. He has a minor league career that indicates that he has some power, but not 20 HR a year power in the major leagues. Some may want to believe that it wasn't Jack's decision to bring back Griffey in 2009, but I don't. If so, why did he wait so long to make the decision? Wouldn't it have been better to make the decision early in the offseason, when the could sell more ticket plans? It's more likely that Jack couldn't find a better option for the money he had to spend. There's no secret agenda. And, what about Griffey's 2009 performance indicated that he wasn't a good option. He generated fan interest, he had the image of being a team leader on a young team, etc. Again, just who was available for the money he got paid, who could have made a big difference. It was a horrible season when everything went wrong. They happen. For as long as I've been watching the game, teams that are suppose to win, don't sometimes. And, like the Giants last year and the M's in 2009, sometimes teams that aren't suppose to win, do much better. There is nothing mystic about it, it's just baseball. |
![]() |
| Copyright 2010 Prospect Insider | Created by AQ Central Prospect Insider is optimized for Mozilla Firefox and Google Chrome |