| By Jason A. Churchill | ![]() | By 11-01-2011 |
| 1. By: MarinersArmy on 11-02-2011 01:24:16 Agreed with Vargas, but who would take him? |
| 2. By: jgstecker on 11-02-2011 11:15:57 I'm not opposed to dealing Vargas, per se. But we already need at least one SP this offseason; two if you don't want to trust Furbush or Beavan. He'd have to go for something useful. I'm not sure why another team would want to give up anything special Vargas if they could just sign Bedard, or Capuano, or Maholm, or somebody for less money. |
| 3. By: Edman on 11-02-2011 13:30:40 Agree with jgstecker. Seattle is thin on starting pitching at the major league level. Why would they trade for a higher price option, when they could sign someone as a free agent, for less money and get nearly the same results? I think Vargas stays, at least until Paxton, Walker, Hultzen are ready to assume a spot in the rotation. I don't think they'll have that answer until spring training. |
| 4. By: maqman on 11-02-2011 14:04:24 I hope Vargas does stay. I think the twist he added to his delivery the last three starts this past season actually will make him a better pitcher next season, say from a #5 to a #4. Beavan I believe still has some promise and at 6'7" he adds a couple of perceived MPH to his heater. Furbush doesn't inspire confidence in the rotation for me, so he'll probably win a Cy Young Award. |
| 5. By: Mackie on 11-02-2011 20:11:42 @#3, good points, particularly about spring training. I think it should be quite interesting this time around. From among Felix, Pineda, Vargas, Beavan, Paxton, Hultzen, Furbush and a few others the Mariners ought to be able to put together a pretty good rotation for 2012. I don't think Blake Beavan is a bad pitcher. He is not great, but he could be quite useful as a BOR guy. Seems he has more upside than Vargas does at this point too, although I agree a bit with Maq that Vargas started better near the end of this past season. Having average pitchers like both Vargas and Beavan in the rotation, healthy and eating up innings... is probably not a bad thing, at least for right now. |
| 6. By: StandinPat on 11-03-2011 02:08:23 "Why would they trade for a higher price option, when they could sign someone as a free agent, for less money and get nearly the same results?" 1) Who exactly are these someone's that you're certain are better and cheaper than Vargas? 2) How do you know every other team looking for a starter can simply sign someone? Is there a large number of cheap dependable starters on the free agent market that I'm unaware of? |
![]() |
| Copyright 2010 Prospect Insider | Created by AQ Central Prospect Insider is optimized for Mozilla Firefox and Google Chrome |