| By Jason A. Churchill | ![]() | By 11-25-2008 |
For a system so shallow with high-reward, high-probability, near-ready prospects of any kind, it’s no wonder that a risky, yet toolsy 21-year-old is their prospect of the year.| 1. By: StandinPat on 11-25-2008 22:43:01 Jason, What's your opinion of Halman's raw power and how it equates to the majors? I know for many prospects their contact rates and extra base totals are very much tied to each other, but Halman seems like a guy who could hit .230-.240 and still wind up going yard 25-30 times. Thoughts? |
| 2. By: Blowgun7 on 11-25-2008 23:05:47 Jason, I see you evaluate Moore as potentially being above average behind the dish, yet USSM I believe came to the conclusion that he may not even be average defensively |
| 3. By: Jason A. Churchill on 11-25-2008 23:18:05 I'm sure the difference is in the wording. I'm saying he's potentially average to above-average defensively, meaning he has the tools, raw skills and work ethic to get there, and USSM, whether it's Dave or whoever, is projecting. Right now, compared to the starters in MLB, Moore is below average, but the difference isn't light years. It's visible, but it's not a large gap. It's easy to sit back and say that a prospect isn't something when the odds are obviously stacked against every talent in the game to be what their tools suggest they COULD be. I'm merely talking about the "could" part, which is why you will read the terms "probability" a lot in the handbook. |
| 4. By: Jason A. Churchill on 11-26-2008 15:18:38 re: Halman's power Sure, he's that kind of hitter right now. Hopefully he can get better in the contact department without sacrificing too much power. |
| 5. By: Walrus on 11-27-2008 02:03:21 Jason, Happy Turkey Day. Just out of curiousity, IF the Mariners told San Diego that they would take on all of Peavy's contract, provided that San Diego take Washburn at half his contract...what more would it take to get Peavy? Is it more than RRS, Lopez, Halman or Saunders, R.Johnson or Moore? Just curious...because that would be one strong starting staff. |
| 6. By: jgstecker on 11-27-2008 11:49:11 Re: the Ibanez sidebar: Do the Phillies not factor in at all? Minaya had some interesting comments in the Daily news this morning: "Minaya also confirmed the Mets' widely reported interest in free agent outfielder Raul Ibañez, although the GM noted that pitching is the priority for now. "Minaya acknowledged trying to acquire Ibañez from the Mariners last July. "Last year we did talk to them during the trading deadline about him," Minaya said. "Unfortunately, we were not able to get a trade done. We've heard very good reports about him - not only as a player, but as a person. I understand the Phillies, they're one of the teams that's considering him. We are also keeping an eye on that situation, even though we're focusing right now on pitching primarily. But he is a good player." |
| 7. By: rturk89 on 11-27-2008 15:32:28 Jason, I believe the Mets have the 25th pick and the Cubs have the 32nd pick. At least that's what it says on Baseball America. This is based on if the M's don't sign Fields. If they do sign him then the Mets have the 24th and the Cubs have the 31st. The Yankees recieved compensation for not signing Gerrit Cole which right now is the 29th pick. |
![]() |
| Copyright 2010 Prospect Insider | Created by AQ Central Prospect Insider is optimized for Mozilla Firefox and Google Chrome |