| By Rick Randall | ![]() | By 03-13-2011 |
Each week here at Prospect Insider we will take a look around the minor and major leagues at some intriguing prospects and their performances from the past week of action. This first installment takes a look at some of the prospects making noise in Spring Training for their clubs.| 1. By: VikingArthur on 03-13-2011 23:31:10 It must be exciting to be a Nationals fan knowing that Harper is coming and coming quickly (not to mention Strasburg returning in 2012). Am I the only one who thinks he could be a legit star next year at age 19? Awesome! Would be a HUGE story if he got called up this year. This column is great... as much as I love reading about Ackley, Pineda and Franklin it is fun to read about other teams young guns. Baseball season is almost upon us! Love it. |
| 2. By: Rick Randall on 03-14-2011 17:07:55 Thanks VikingArthur, these kinds of pieces are great to do. I think there is a chance that 2012 is when Harper's big league career gets rolling -- probably after the service time issue clears itself up, and I think the hype will always make him a star, even if the talent isn't quite polished at that point. |
| 3. By: Slack on 03-14-2011 19:37:08 Brett Lawrie is another prospect to keep an eye on. How realistic a shot does he have of making the Blue Jays 25 man roster out of spring training? If I were the Blue Jays, I would wait but he hasn't made that an easy choice for them. |
| 4. By: FWBrodie on 03-14-2011 20:48:40 Question for whoever wants to answer: Freeman vs. Belt, who will have a better 2011 ML season and who do you take long term? Also, Baker is reporting the 5th spot in the rotation is "Pineda's to lose." Are you buying it? |
| 5. By: Rick Randall on 03-15-2011 09:57:54 FWBrodie, Freeman is going to play every day, Belt -- if he makes the team -- will share time in some capacity, so Freeman is the easy choice for 2011 for me. Freeman has a bit more of a track record, too, but Belt's 2010 and his ST this season are very promising. I'll defer to Jason on the Pineda question. |
| 6. By: maqman on 03-15-2011 13:56:40 It's going to be interesting to find out if we are glad or sad that we didn't Montero. |
| 7. By: Jason A. Churchill on 03-15-2011 17:03:59 Belt has a better future. I buy that Pineda has the job unless he loses it. They aren't concerned with service time with him and ,a href="http://prospectinsider.com/view/ackley,-pineda-and-service-time/" target=new>as I wrote a few weeks back, neither am I. He has stuff to work on before he appears as a finished product, but he can polish off that development in the big leagues. And since they are in a rebuilding year, they can pull him from games and from the rotation whenever is necessary to avoid overworking him. |
| 8. By: baseballman on 03-15-2011 17:43:24 I know this has gotten discussed quite a bit, but since he wrote it just yesterday and it includes Montero, JAC (or anyone) have you read Ken Rosenthal's article about trading Felix to the yanks? A 5 for 1 deal where Montero, Banuelos/Betances, Nova, Nunez and Noesi/Adams were the names he discussed. What I got out of it was that Rosenthal believes Jack is in the wrong for not even taking phone calls on Felix. |
| 9. By: rjfrik on 03-15-2011 18:09:08 If Yanks really want to talk Felix they have to lead with Cano Montero Banuelos and Betances Then they have to throw in Nova Nunez Noesi and Adams That is the only way Felix sniffs NY. They have to literally blow our socks off and including Cano with all of the prospects is the only way it gets done. |
| 10. By: rocketdawg31 on 03-15-2011 18:11:02 I wouldn't worry about it much, baseballman. When it's reported that Zduriencik "won't even listen to overtures", that's just GM posturing for the public. As a good GM, yes, Z WILL listen to everything proposed. Doesn't mean he'd do it. And I don't think he trades Felix unless it was the kind of deal that just simply couldn't be passed up. If I were a GM, sure...Montero/Banuelos/Nova/Nunez and Noesi would at least get me thinking about the possibilities. But Yankees GM Brian Cashman would have to *offer* that first: the idea that he would is just speculation on Rosenthal's part. Although I wouldn't put it past Cashman to offer something like that. Cashman's keen, he knows his team has severe weaknesses and that the fans know it. More than that, the BoSox flat-out whupped their asses in moves during the off-season. The main issue I had with Rosenthal's issue was with how readily he thinks Felix would just sign a long-term extension, how money would just buy him into being a Yankee. From what I've seen, Felix likes money enough, but doesn't live for it. And he seems to have a REAL distaste for the Yankees. |
| 11. By: Timberwolf on 03-15-2011 23:18:53 Trading Felix sends the message that we are a lame, second tier franchise that will never compete. We may not have the Yankee/Red Sox ability to keep ALL of our players, but we have to hang on to #1 unless he really wanted to leave. Any Mariner executive who even considers trading Felix should be tarred and feathered before he gets fired. |
![]() |
| Copyright 2010 Prospect Insider | Created by AQ Central Prospect Insider is optimized for Mozilla Firefox and Google Chrome |